Alternative to WeasyPrint

WeasyPrint vs TemplateFox

WeasyPrint is a mature, actively-developed Python library for turning HTML and CSS into PDFs. If you're looking for a managed alternative with a visual template editor, a REST API, built-in data binding and no-code integrations — here's how TemplateFox compares.

Try TemplateFox for Free Documentation
WeasyPrint logo About WeasyPrint

What is WeasyPrint?

WeasyPrint is an open-source Python library that renders HTML and CSS directly into PDF (or PNG). Released in 2011 by the French agency Kozea, it was built around the CSS Paged Media specification — the same standard browsers use for print layouts — and deliberately avoids depending on a full browser engine. Instead, it uses Pango for text layout and Cairo for drawing.

It's built for developers working in Python who want to generate documents from HTML templates: invoices, reports, academic papers, technical documentation. You typically pair it with a templating engine like Jinja2 or Django templates, render the HTML, and call HTML(...).write_pdf(). A command-line interface is also available for one-off conversions.

The project is currently maintained by Court Bouillon, a small team that spun out of Kozea, and ships regular releases. It has a strong focus on CSS Paged Media conformance and is widely used in Python-heavy stacks. A few adjacent tools (pydyf, cairocffi) are developed alongside it.

Pricing

WeasyPrint is free and open source under a BSD-style license — no license fee, no usage limits. The real cost is operational: installing and keeping the Python stack patched, packaging Pango / Cairo and the right fonts into container images, wiring up templating for data, and writing the CSS Paged Media rules that make running headers, footers and page breaks behave. For a few PDFs per day, that's fine. For production workloads, engineering time spent on templates, fonts and page-break tuning typically exceeds the cost of a managed API.

Feature comparison

An honest, section-by-section look at what each tool does and doesn't do.

1. Project health & rendering

WeasyPrint
TemplateFox
Project status
Actively maintained (by Court Bouillon)
Actively maintained
Rendering approach
HTML + CSS with CSS Paged Media
HTML + CSS template engine
CSS Flexbox & Grid
Flexbox supported, Grid partial
Supported
PDF/A, PDF/X, PDF/UA
Supported via CLI flag
PDF/A-1b, A-2b, A-3b, PDF/X, PDF/UA via API

WeasyPrint and TemplateFox are close on this axis: both are actively maintained, both render HTML + CSS with modern engines, and both can output PDF/A, PDF/X and PDF/UA. The subtle differences are around CSS Grid coverage and how you invoke compliance formats — a CLI flag on one side, an API parameter on the other. If your only question is "does the engine render my HTML correctly", either tool will do the job.

2. Developer experience

WeasyPrint
TemplateFox
Setup
Python + Pango / Cairo system deps
API key, nothing to install
Template editor
None (raw HTML + CSS files)
Visual drag-and-drop editor
API
Python library + CLI
REST API + SDKs (7 languages)
No-code platforms
None
Zapier, Make, n8n, Airtable, Bubble

WeasyPrint is a library, not a product. You install Python, the Pango and Cairo system libraries, package fonts, and wire up your own HTTP layer if non-Python services need to call it. Templates are raw files in your repository. TemplateFox calls out to a REST API (or an official SDK in seven languages), non-developers can edit templates in a visual editor, and there's nothing to install or patch.

3. Features & data

WeasyPrint
TemplateFox
Dynamic data binding
Bring your own (Jinja2, Django, etc.)
Variables, loops, conditions
Multi-page tables
CSS page breaks (manual tuning)
Automatic page breaks
Barcodes & QR codes
External libs (python-barcode, qrcode…) + image embed
Built-in (Code128, EAN-13, QR…)
Headers & footers
CSS Paged Media (@page, running elements)
Supported via editor

This is where the gap shows up. With WeasyPrint, data binding means adding Jinja2 or Django templates to the stack; barcodes and QR codes mean a second library (python-barcode, qrcode, or reportlab.graphics) that generates an image you then embed in the HTML; running headers and footers mean CSS Paged Media (@page rules, margin boxes, named strings, page counters). It's all doable, and all well-specified — but each piece is a small project on its own, with its own dependencies and upgrade path. TemplateFox packages these primitives — variables, loops, conditions, barcodes, QR codes, configurable headers and footers — directly in the editor, so you don't maintain a pile of glue.

4. Hosting, compliance & pricing

WeasyPrint
TemplateFox
Self-hosted
Yes (runs in your Python process)
No (managed cloud)
Data handling
Your infrastructure, your rules
GDPR principles, privacy by design
Maintenance
You own it (Python, Pango, fonts, patches)
Handled by us
Cost
Free OSS + your engineering time
Free tier (60/mo), then paid

This is where WeasyPrint keeps a real edge: if your data can't leave your servers, a self-hosted Python library is the right answer. For everything else, TemplateFox is a managed service built on GDPR principles (data minimization, right to erasure, 72-hour breach notification). The subscription cost is usually lower than the engineering time saved on fonts, page-break tuning, and keeping the Python stack patched.

Want PDF generation without the Python stack?

No Pango, no Cairo, no font packaging. Just an API call. No credit card, 60 free PDFs per month.

Try TemplateFox for free

When it might be time to switch

Two honest answers, depending on what you're optimizing for.

Switch to TemplateFox

Signs you'll gain from moving

  • Non-technical teammates need to edit templates without touching code or CSS
  • Dynamic data, barcodes, QR codes and multi-page tables are separate libraries you keep gluing together
  • CSS Paged Media setup (running headers, footers, page counters) is eating engineering time
  • You want a REST API callable from any language, not just Python
  • You want to plug PDF generation into Zapier, Make, n8n or Airtable
  • Keeping the Python stack, Pango / Cairo and fonts patched is not where you want to spend time

Browse 30+ ready-made templates →

Start building for free
Stay with WeasyPrint

When it can still be the right call

  • Self-hosting is a hard requirement — data must never leave your servers
  • Your team lives in Python and you already have Jinja2 templates for your PDFs
  • You need fine-grained control over CSS Paged Media that only a library can give you
  • Your PDF volume is low and the current setup works fine as-is

WeasyPrint is one of the best-designed open-source PDF renderers out there. If you're happy running it in your own infrastructure and have the Python expertise to maintain it, it's a strong long-term choice.

Used by 100+ Developers

Companies generating PDFs in production.

Uptime 99.997% Last 90 days

Measured live on our public status page.

Rendered 100k+ PDFs generated

Growing every day on a scalable infrastructure.

Frequently asked questions

Is WeasyPrint still maintained?

Yes. WeasyPrint was created in 2011 by Kozea and is now maintained by Court Bouillon. It ships regular releases and is one of the most active open-source HTML-to-PDF projects in the Python ecosystem.

What are the main limitations of WeasyPrint?

WeasyPrint is a rendering library, not a product — so anything beyond HTML-to-PDF is something you add yourself. Dynamic data needs Jinja2 or Django templates. Barcodes and QR codes need a second library (python-barcode, qrcode, reportlab.graphics) that generates an image you then embed in your HTML. Running headers and footers rely on CSS Paged Media (@page rules, margin boxes, named strings, page counters) — powerful but spec-heavy. Non-Python services need their own HTTP wrapper on top. And operationally, you own the Python runtime, the Pango/Cairo system dependencies, font packaging, and security patches.

How does TemplateFox compare?

TemplateFox is a cloud-based PDF generation API. You design templates in a visual editor (still HTML and CSS under the hood), then generate PDFs via REST API or no-code platforms. Data binding, barcodes, QR codes, page headers and footers are built in, and you can output PDFs in PDF/A, PDF/X, and PDF/UA formats without writing any CSS Paged Media.

Can I reuse my WeasyPrint HTML and CSS?

Mostly yes. TemplateFox templates are HTML and CSS with a modern rendering engine, so most of your existing markup will work. The parts that change are the templating syntax (move Jinja2 variables into TemplateFox's data-binding syntax) and the running header / footer setup, which moves from @page margin boxes to fields configured in the editor.

What if I need to self-host?

TemplateFox is a managed service — you don't run any infrastructure. If self-hosting is a hard requirement (air-gapped networks, strict data residency, or regulated environments), WeasyPrint running inside your own Python service is a solid choice and keeps data in your environment. For most teams, the tradeoff of not maintaining a Python renderer and its system dependencies is worth it.

Does TemplateFox support PDF/A?

Yes. You can generate PDF/A-1b, PDF/A-2b, PDF/A-3b, PDF/X, and PDF/UA compliant documents. WeasyPrint also supports these standards — so if PDF/A is your only concern, that's not a reason to switch. The difference is in the developer experience around it.

How much does TemplateFox cost?

There's a free tier with 60 PDFs per month, no credit card required. Paid plans start at $19/month. WeasyPrint is free and open source — the practical cost is the engineering time spent on Jinja2 templating, CSS Paged Media rules, font packaging, and keeping the Python/Pango/Cairo stack patched. See pricing.

Can I call the API from Python like I use WeasyPrint?

Yes. There's an official Python SDK — install it with pip, pass your API key and template data, and get a PDF URL back. No system dependencies, no Pango or Cairo to install.

Automate your PDF generation

Complete documentation, no-code integrations, and a powerful API to help you generate PDFs at scale. Let us handle the boring stuff.

Start generating→ Read the docs