Alternative to PDFMonkey

PDFMonkey vs TemplateFox

PDFMonkey is a solid, template-first PDF generation API — one of the closest peers to TemplateFox in the market. If you're evaluating both, here's a fair, feature-by-feature comparison covering the template editor, REST API, SDKs, PDF standards and pricing.

PDFMonkey logo About PDFMonkey

What is PDFMonkey?

PDFMonkey is a template-based PDF generation API. You design a template in the PDFMonkey dashboard — either with the visual builder or directly in HTML, CSS and Liquid — then call the REST API with JSON data to produce a PDF. It's one of the closest peer products to TemplateFox in the “template-first API” category.

It's built for developers and no-code teams who want to offload PDF generation: invoices, reports, certificates, contracts. PDFMonkey supports Google Fonts and external CSS, exposes webhooks for async generation, and plugs into Zapier, Make, n8n, Workato, Bubble and Glide. The team ships from France (the footer reads “Made in France with love”).

The product is actively maintained and has been running for several years. The official SDK list is currently limited to Ruby; developers on other stacks integrate against the REST API directly. PDF/A, PDF/X and PDF/UA compliance are not mentioned in the public documentation as of this writing — something to verify against your own needs.

Pricing

PDFMonkey offers a free tier with 20 documents per month. Paid plans start at €5/month for 300 documents (Starter), €15/month for 3,000 documents (Pro), €60/month for 5,000 documents with unlimited retention (Pro+), and €300/month for 60,000 (Premium). Overage is handled via “Boost Packs” at €5 per 1,000 extra documents; annual billing saves about 10%. Document retention is 1 day on Free and Starter, 7 days on Pro, and unlimited on Pro+ and Premium. See the PDFMonkey pricing page for current rates. At roughly 1,000 PDFs/month, the Pro tier (€15/mo) is the realistic comparison — TemplateFox's Starter at $19/mo covers 1,000 PDFs, so the two land close on price at that volume; the decision usually comes down to features.

Feature comparison

An honest, section-by-section look at what each product does and doesn't do.

1. Rendering & PDF output

PDFMonkey
TemplateFox
Modern CSS (Flexbox, Grid)
Supported
Supported
PDF/A, PDF/X, PDF/UA
Not documented
PDF/A-1b, A-2b, A-3b, PDF/X, PDF/UA
Font embedding & web fonts
Google Fonts, custom fonts (paid plans)
Google Fonts, custom fonts

Both products render modern HTML and CSS well enough for the typical invoice, report or contract. The clearest difference is PDF standards: TemplateFox outputs PDF/A-1b, PDF/A-2b, PDF/A-3b, PDF/X and PDF/UA natively, while PDFMonkey's documentation doesn't cover these formats. If your use case is archival, regulatory or accessibility-bound, that's a meaningful gap; if it's a web-facing invoice, the two engines land in a similar place.

2. Developer experience

PDFMonkey
TemplateFox
REST API
Yes
Yes
Official SDKs
Ruby
7 languages (Node, Python, PHP, Go, Ruby, Java, .NET)
No-code integrations
Zapier, Make, n8n, Workato, Bubble, Glide
Zapier, Make, n8n, Airtable, Bubble
Webhooks
Supported
Supported

Both products expose a REST API and webhooks, and both cover the main no-code platforms. PDFMonkey lists Zapier, Make, n8n, Workato, Bubble and Glide; TemplateFox covers Zapier, Make, n8n, Airtable and Bubble — so the overlap is wide, with each product reaching some platforms the other doesn't. The bigger gap is SDK coverage: PDFMonkey ships a Ruby SDK officially, while TemplateFox publishes SDKs for seven languages (Node, Python, PHP, Go, Ruby, Java, .NET).

3. Templates & data

PDFMonkey
TemplateFox
Template editor
Dashboard-based (code + builder)
Visual drag-and-drop editor
Template language
Liquid
TemplateFox variables, loops, conditions
Variables, loops, conditions
Supported (via Liquid)
Supported
Barcodes
Via third-party JS libraries (including QR)
Built-in (Code128, EAN-13, QR…)
Multi-page tables & page breaks
Supported
Supported
Headers & footers
Supported
Supported

Both products have dashboard-based template editors with variables, loops and conditions. PDFMonkey uses Liquid, which is a real advantage if you're already on a Liquid-based stack (Shopify, Jekyll) or have existing Liquid templates. TemplateFox's differentiators on this axis are the visual drag-and-drop editor for non-technical teammates, and built-in barcodes (Code128, EAN-13, QR) that don't need an external generator.

4. Pricing & commercial terms

PDFMonkey
TemplateFox
Free tier
20 docs/month
60 PDFs/month
Starter plan
€5/mo — 300 docs
$19/mo — 1,000 PDFs
~1,000 PDFs/month tier
Pro €15/mo (3,000 docs)
Starter $19/mo (1,000 PDFs)
Annual discount
10% off yearly
25% off yearly (3 months free)
Overage pricing
Boost Packs (€5 / 1,000 docs)
Upgrade plan
Document retention
1 day (Free, Starter); 7 days (Pro); unlimited (Pro+, Premium)
Retrieve anytime while account is active

Pricing is close at most volumes. PDFMonkey's €5 Starter is cheaper if 300 docs/month is genuinely enough, but jumps to €15/mo for 3,000 docs at the Pro tier. TemplateFox's free tier is three times larger (60 vs. 20 PDFs/month), the Starter plan covers 1,000 PDFs at $19/mo, and the annual discount is larger (25% vs. ~10%). Both products allow upgrade/downgrade at any time with no long-term contracts.

Curious how TemplateFox stacks up on your templates?

Free tier included, no credit card, 60 PDFs per month — enough to rebuild a template and A/B the output against PDFMonkey.

Try TemplateFox for free

When it might be time to switch

Two honest answers, depending on what you're optimizing for.

Switch to TemplateFox

Signs you'll gain from moving

  • You need PDF/A, PDF/X or PDF/UA output for compliance, archival or accessibility
  • Your stack isn't Ruby and you'd rather use an official SDK than wrap the REST API yourself
  • You generate barcode-heavy documents (Code128, EAN-13) and want them built in, not wired through an external library
  • Non-technical teammates need a visual drag-and-drop editor, not just a code/builder dashboard
  • You use Airtable as the data source and want a first-class integration
  • The free tier matters for dev/staging — 60 PDFs/month vs. 20 is a meaningful headroom difference

Browse 30+ ready-made templates →

Stay with PDFMonkey

When it can still be the right call

  • You're already on a Liquid-based stack (Shopify, Jekyll) and the template syntax is second nature to your team
  • You already have a library of PDFMonkey templates and they render exactly how you want
  • The €5 Starter tier is a genuinely good fit because 300 docs/month is all you need
  • Your no-code needs revolve around Workato or Glide specifically, which PDFMonkey supports and TemplateFox currently doesn't

PDFMonkey is a real, maintained peer product — if your current setup works and you don't need PDF/A, extra SDKs or a visual editor, there's no urgent reason to migrate.

Used by 100+ Developers

Companies generating PDFs in production.

Uptime 99.997% Last 90 days

Measured live on our public status page.

Rendered 100k+ PDFs generated

Growing every day on a scalable infrastructure.

Frequently asked questions

How does PDFMonkey pricing work?

PDFMonkey offers a free tier with 20 documents per month. Paid plans start at €5/month for 300 documents (Starter), €15/month for 3,000 documents (Pro), €60/month for 5,000 documents with unlimited retention (Pro+), and €300/month for 60,000 documents (Premium). Overage is handled via "Boost Packs" at €5 per 1,000 extra documents, and annual billing saves roughly 10%. Check the PDFMonkey pricing page for current rates.

What is PDFMonkey best at?

PDFMonkey is a solid choice if you're comfortable with Liquid templating (same syntax as Shopify or Jekyll) and want a template-first API with a dashboard-based editor. It has a broad no-code integration list (Zapier, Make, n8n, Workato, Bubble, Glide) and a mature webhook flow. If you already have Liquid templates or a Liquid-based stack, that familiarity is a real advantage.

What are PDFMonkey's main limitations?

PDFMonkey doesn't document PDF/A, PDF/X, or PDF/UA compliance, so it's not a natural fit for archival or accessibility-bound PDFs. Only a Ruby SDK is listed officially — other languages call the REST API directly. There's no built-in barcode filter: even QR codes require wiring in a third-party JS library. Document retention is 1 day on Free and Starter, 7 days on Pro, and unlimited on Pro+ and Premium.

How does TemplateFox compare to PDFMonkey?

Both are template-based PDF generation APIs with a dashboard editor, webhooks and no-code integrations. TemplateFox differs on a few concrete points: seven official SDKs (vs. one), built-in barcodes (Code128, EAN-13, QR), native PDF/A / PDF/X / PDF/UA output, and a visual drag-and-drop editor. PDFMonkey wins on Liquid familiarity if you're already on a Liquid stack, and on the €5 entry-level plan if you genuinely only need 300 docs/month.

Can I migrate my PDFMonkey templates to TemplateFox?

The HTML and CSS port over directly. The template language is the main thing to translate: PDFMonkey uses Liquid ({{ variable }}, {% for %}, etc.), while TemplateFox has its own variables, loops and conditions syntax. For straightforward invoices and reports the rewrite is usually short; for templates with many Liquid filters it takes longer. You can try it on the free tier before committing.

Does PDFMonkey support PDF/A?

PDFMonkey's public documentation doesn't mention PDF/A, PDF/X or PDF/UA support. If you need archival-grade or accessibility-compliant PDFs, TemplateFox supports PDF/A-1b, PDF/A-2b, PDF/A-3b, PDF/X and PDF/UA natively — pass the desired standard as a parameter in the API call.

How do the two compare at 1,000 PDFs/month?

At 1,000 PDFs/month, PDFMonkey's Starter (€5/mo, 300 docs) isn't enough — you'd need the Pro plan at €15/mo (3,000 docs). TemplateFox's Starter plan is $19/mo for 1,000 PDFs. The numbers are close at this volume; the decision typically comes down to features (SDK languages, PDF/A, built-in barcodes, visual editor) rather than pure cost.

What's the TemplateFox free tier?

60 PDFs per month on the free tier, no credit card required. You get the full editor, REST API, SDKs and no-code integrations on the free tier — same product as the paid plans, just with a monthly quota. See plans.

Automate your PDF generation

Complete documentation, no-code integrations, and a powerful API to help you generate PDFs at scale. Let us handle the boring stuff.